LA_MERC_Dirge
November 18th, 2003, 08:11 AM
Finally someone who tells it how it is about the non-BCS conferences.
http://www.foxsports.com/content/view?contentId=1854192
A couple of my favorite points:
1) BCS schools get a return on their investment. They put more money into trying to win championships, hence they see better returns
2) If it wasn't for the BCS, the non-BCS schools would never have a chance of getting in a big bowl, all the prime bowls would still be locked up in conference ties.
Idiot schools like Tulane whine about not getting any of the pie, but then barely vote to stay 1-A because they will not spend enough money on their program. Heck, Tulane forced businesses to buy season tickets rather than try to get them on their own through producing a quality product.
kk rant over :D
Read the article though, it's great!
http://www.foxsports.com/content/view?contentId=1854192
A couple of my favorite points:
1) BCS schools get a return on their investment. They put more money into trying to win championships, hence they see better returns
2) If it wasn't for the BCS, the non-BCS schools would never have a chance of getting in a big bowl, all the prime bowls would still be locked up in conference ties.
Idiot schools like Tulane whine about not getting any of the pie, but then barely vote to stay 1-A because they will not spend enough money on their program. Heck, Tulane forced businesses to buy season tickets rather than try to get them on their own through producing a quality product.
kk rant over :D
Read the article though, it's great!